Rediff Logo
Line
Channels: Astrology | Broadband | Chat | Contests | E-cards | Money | Movies | Romance | Weather | Wedding | Women
Partner Channels: Auctions | Auto | Bill Pay | Jobs | Lifestyle | TechJobs | Technology | Travel
Line
Home > Cricket > News > Report
February 9, 2001
Feedback  
  sections

 -  News
 -  Diary
 -  Betting Scandal
 -  Schedule
 -  Statistics
 -  Interview
 -  Columns
 -  Gallery
 -  Broadband
 -  Match Reports
 -  Archives
 -  Search Rediff


 
 Search the Internet
         Tips
 Other cricket sites

E-Mail this report to a friend

Print this page

High Court acts on Jadeja's petition

Onkar Singh in New Delhi

The Delhi high court on Friday took up for hearing the writ petition of cricketer Ajay Jadeja, challenging the order of the Board of Control for Cricket in India banning him from playing cricket for the next five years and holding any position in any of the cricketing bodies in the country.

After hearing the petition, Justice Vijender Jain issued notices to the Union of India, through the secretary, sports; the BCCI; K Madhavan, BCCI commissioner, anti-corruption; BCCI president and chairman of the disciplinary committee Dr A C Muthiah and others asking them to show cause why the petition should not be admitted.

The judge has asked all concerned to file their replies within four weeks, and also given counsel for the petitioner, R K Anand, two weeks after that date to file his rejoinder to the replies.

The matter will now come up on March 29 for hearing.

The judge refused to grant a stay against the showcause notice issued to Jadeja by the ministry of sports under rule 17 of the Arjuna Award conferment procedure.

Jadeja in his petition had asked the Delhi High Court to stay the withdrawal of Arjuna awards by the Government of India, to which the government counsel replied that they had only issued him a showcause notice and had taken no decision regarding the withdrawal of the award.

Throughout the hearing, Jadeja was present in court. In fact, at one stage he was sitting among sports scribes and legal correspondents who had descended in large numbers to record the proceedings.

Noted constitutional lawyer Kapil Sibal accepted the notices on behalf of the BCCI and other officials. He interjected many a time during the hearing of arguments, while noted criminal lawyer R K Anand argued for Jadeja.

The 762-page petition was read through by the learned counsel who also cited several judgments to prove that the court did have the right to intervene in this case and protect the right of Jadeja as a cricketer who has been denied his fundamental right to live with dignity and earn his livelihood through playing cricket.

Mail your comments