Are guaranteed products good, bad or ugly? Any of these could be a fitting opinion depending on the person under consideration. Several factors need to be well thought out before pronouncing a judgment on these products. Is it for a 20-year-old or a 50-year-old? What is the risk profile of that person, what are her/his goals, when does s/he want to retire? What does her/his existing portfolio look like?
Apart from the specifics of the person, it will also help to look at where the markets are at that time (when the investment in such a product is amde) and where you see it heading in the long run.
To quote an example, one of the first of its kind, Birla's Platinum Plus series II was launched during August and December 2008, when the Sensex was around 14,000. You would have already read in multiple articles about the allocation proportions the product has to adopt to make the guarantee available to all investors.
In a nut shell, there will be high equity allocation in the initial years after which the fund will start moving into debt in increasing proportions to ensure that sufficient money is locked in to provide for the guarantee. Coming back to the example, it made perfect sense to invest in the Birla product back in 2008 as investors were positive about the markets growing even in the short run.
Given below is a real life example of absolute returns made by an investor in this plan:
Guaranteed NAV: Rs 15.5508
Guaranteed maturity benefit: Rs 21,01,973
December 28, 2008: Rs -10,00,000 (The investment made in the first year; shown negative because it is an outgo from an investor's account)
December 28, 2008: Rs -500,000 (The investment made in the second year; shown negative because it is an outgo from an investor's account)
March 23, 2010: Rs 20,48,594 (In two years an investment of Rs 15,00,000 has increased to Rs 20,48,594, a gain of 36.57 per cent)
Return till date: 36.57 per cent
Click NEXT to read if guaranteed NAV products are a good fit for you
this
Users
Comment
article